So he would not be spending a lot of time on this when in a game he is going to take 997 ± 183 short movements with 105 ± 52 of these being high intensity with duration of about 1.7 seconds (McInnes, et. The fact Nash is an elite athlete is hardly relevant (looking at the sport he plays), as you look at the physiological demands of the sport, and it does not require an aerobic capacity above a threshold level (ie yes is important to an extent, but over and above you are wasting your time, as you need other attributes). These although very good scores are hardly unrealistic for the top end junior kids (although blair at 110 kg would be a fit 110 and at 14, I can agree that is very questionable, but not impossible).
So I don't know what you are talking about "real footballers" lol.ġ58570 the beep test gives an estimate of relative maximal oxygen uptake. As Lynn mentioned a "15 meter beep test", I asked how this was run as haven't ever heard of it.
So 18 girls look around the 10+ mark, your best girls may get 13-15 as Kobe mentioned, but I would suggest you are very lucky to get a handful of girls in that range at this level.ġ42293 read it again I never questioned a 15 as that would estimate a relative VO2 max of about 65 ml/kg/min, good but hardly unrealistic. PS I would be using the institute data rather than the general, but thought you might like it. However there are many components of fitness used in basketball, this is only one of them. On a side not I would be careful about using this test as your only test for basketball, there are many tests I would consider more important than a beep test, yes this may be an easy test to run, and can give you some info. (I have the full chart if you need it, but thought I'd give you a rough guide) Now I will help you convert this to Beep test scores (there is a fair in between poor and avg, and a good between avg and excellent, so if it falls in the "gap" that is what it is)
I have a general Aus Guide that says VO2 max Firstly there are a couple of different "beep tests" out there, so make sure you get the right one (any in Aus should* be the same, I think it was European had a slightly diff version from memory, could be wrong).Īny way I have some data from about 99 I think (ok a little old).Īlthough that group had 2 kids out of 8 get 6+1 and 6+2 real avg is normally around 8 (those two were injured)
0 kommentar(er)
